Thursday, January 30, 2020

Sanders has the courage of his convictions


Bernie Sanders has spent almost 40 years serving in elected office. Sanders served as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, before being elected to the U.S House and Senate.

During those four decades, Sanders has displayed an incredible consistency. He has fought for his beliefs, even when doing so was unpopular.

The Democratic Socialist from Vermont had the dedication and courage to fight for peace and LGBT rights at times when public opinion made it difficult for politicians to do so.

There are many wonderful candidates running for the Democratic nomination. The Kansas Democratic Party is allowing voters to use ranked choice voting in its presidential primary.

I will continue to follow the primary and remain open to new information, but Bernie Sanders will almost certainly be my first choice for president. 

Voters should consider choosing a fighter who stands by his beliefs and does the right thing, when other politicians are often blown astray by political winds.



Opponent of the Iraq War

In Oct. 2002, Bernie Sanders, then a member of the U.S. House, voted against the invasion of Iraq. Former Vice President Joe Biden, one of Sanders’s rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, voted in favor of going to war.  

The U.S. House voted in favor of authorizing the military invasion by a vote of 296 to 133. The U.S. Senate voted for the war 77 to 23.

Sanders explained his position during a speech in Congress one day before the vote.  

“I don’t think any member of this body disagrees that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant, a murderer, and a man who has started two wars. He is clearly someone who cannot be trusted or believed,” Sanders began. “The question, Mr. Speaker, is not whether we like Saddam Hussein or not, the question is whether he represents an imminent threat to the American people and whether a unilateral American invasion of Iraq will do more harm than good.”





Sanders predicted the great harms the war would ultimately create for both Iraq and the United States.  

“I have not heard any estimates of how many young American men and women might die in such a war, or how many tens of thousands of women and children in Iraq might also be killed,” Sanders said. “As a caring nation, we should do everything we can to prevent the horrible suffering that a war will cause. War must be the last recourse in international relations, not the first.”

Sanders also expressed his concern that the war could be, “extremely expensive,” at a time when the country had a national debt of $6 Trillion. (That now seems quaint by comparison. Our current national debt is $23 Trillion).

Sanders also worried about unintended consequences.

“Who will govern Iraq when Saddam Hussein is removed, and what role will the U.S. play in an ensuing civil war that could develop in that country?” Sanders asked.

The 2003 U.S. invasion led to a civil war in Iraq that killed at least tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. Thousands of American soldiers died fighting in the war, which created conditions that ultimately led to the rise of ISIS.

The Iraq War was the single worst disaster in modern American political history. The Bush Administration and a majority of both houses of Congress were wrong. Bernie Sanders, and a minority of his colleagues, were right.



Advocate for diplomacy and peace

In September 2015, Senator Bernie Sanders spoke eloquently in support of the Iran nuclear deal. Much of his speech echoed his fateful comments on the Iraq War 13 years earlier.

“It is my firm belief that the test of a great nation, with the most powerful military on earth, is not how many wars we can engage in, but how we can use our strengths and our capabilities to resolve international conflicts in a peaceful way,” Sanders said. 





As Sanders advocated for a diplomatic approach to Iran, he explained the devastating cost of the Iraq War for the young men and women America sent to fight it.

“I fear that many of my Republican colleagues do not understand that war must be a last resort, not the first resort,” he said. “It is easy to go to war. It is not so easy to fully comprehend the unintended consequences of that war.”

“In Iraq and Afghanistan, we lost over 6,700 brave men and women, and many others have come home without legs, without arms, without eyesight,” Sanders continued. 

“Let us not forget that 500,000 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan came back to their families with post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.”

“The suicide rate of young veterans is appallingly high. The divorce rate of those who serve is appallingly high, and the impact on their children is appallingly high. God knows how many families have been devastated by these wars.”

Sanders also highlighted the devastation the war brought to Iraq.  

“We should also not forget that many hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children died in that war, and those whose lives who have been have been completely destabilized,” he said. “Hundreds of thousands of people whose lives have been totally altered, including those who are fleeing that country today with only the clothes on their back as refugees.”  



LGBT Ally

As a Congressman in the U.S. House, Bernie Sanders defended the dignity and rights of gay Americans in the 1990s, when few other politicians were willing to do so.





In 1995, Rep. Duke Cunningham, a Republican from California, spoke derisively about members of Congress who would, “put homos in the military.”

Sanders defended the dignity of gay Americans who have served their country in the armed forces.

Was the gentleman referring to the many thousands and thousands of gay people who have put their lives on the line in countless wars defending this country? Was that the group of people that the gentleman was referring to?” Sanders asked.  

Cunningham acknowledged he had used the phrase. Sanders admonished his colleague for attacking gay Americans who have defended their country.

“You used the word, ‘homos in the military.’ You have insulted thousands of men and women who have put their lives on the line. I think you owe them an apology,” Sanders added.  

Today, Sanders supports overturning President Trump’s ban on transgender Americans serving in the military. He also supports the Equality Act, which would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing, and public accommodations.



A Profile in Courage

In 1996, Sanders was one of the few members of Congress to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied equal rights to same-sex couples.

DOMA denied recognition under federal law to same-sex marriages, which prevented members of  same-sex couples from receiving Social Security survivor benefits, insurance benefits, immigration rights, and from being able to jointly file their taxes.

The law also allowed states that banned same-sex marriage to withhold legal recognition of same-sex marriages performed in states that permitted such marriages.

The U.S. House voted in favor of DOMA 342 to 67, with Sanders opposed.

The U.S. Senate subsequently approved the bill 85 to 14. Delaware Senator Joe Biden voted in favor of DOMA.

Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, both of California, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, both of Massachusetts, Ron Wyden, of Oregon, and  Russ Feingold, of Wisconsin, voted against the bill.

President Bill Clinton signed DOMA into law.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the part of the law that denied federal benefits to same-sex couples in 2013 in Windsor v. United States.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the part of the law that allowed states to withhold recognition of same sex marriages carried out in other states in June 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

Bernie Sanders addressed the significance of his vote against DOMA as he campaigned in Oct. 2015 for the Democratic Presidential nomination in the 2016 election.

“In 1996, I faced another fork in the road, a very very difficult political situation. It was called the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, brought forth by a Republican-led Congress,” he said. “And its purpose was clear — to discriminate against gays and lesbians into the law, and let us all remember that gay and lesbian rights were not popular then as they are today.”

“There was a small minority in the house opposed to discriminating against our gay brothers and sisters, and I am proud that I was one of those members,” Sanders added.






Bernie Sanders has displayed a remarkable consistency throughout his political career.

If you were to talk to Sanders at any point in his life, his core values of opposing war, advocating for equality, and fighting for working Americans would shine through.

If you agree that these are values worth fighting for, you could ask for no better champion in the White House than Bernie Sanders.

Thursday, January 23, 2020

My 2020 Vice Presidential recommendations


The first contest in the 2020 Democratic and Republican presidential primaries will take place in less than two weeks. During the Iowa caucus on Feb. 3, voters will set the stage for the contests that follow. 

That means it’s the perfect time to begin considering who potential nominees might choose as their vice presidential running mates. The following candidates are listed in the order of my current preferences for who I would like to win the presidential race.  


1. Bernie Sanders

Strategically, the best VP pick for Sanders would be Elizabeth Warren. A combination ticket between the two of them could potentially unite the progressive wing of the Democratic party and defeat Joe Biden, who has consistently led national polls in the Democratic primary race. 

However, that may no longer be possible after Warren declined a handshake from Sanders and accused him of calling her, “a liar on national TV,” following the most recent Democratic presidential debate. Sanders calmly responded that Warren had called him a liar and that they should talk about the matter another time. 

The rift between the two ideologically similar candidates arose when people close to Warren shared her account of a private conversation between Sanders and Warren with CNN. The private conversation took place in December 2018 ahead of the upcoming presidential race. 

Warren alleges Sanders said that a woman couldn’t win against Trump in 2020. Sanders denies the claim and instead states he said Trump might launch sexist attacks against a female nominee. 

If the relationship between Sanders and Warren is too damaged to make a combination ticket a comfortable arrangement, Sanders has other great options. His campaign co-chair Nina Turner is one of the most effective advocates for how Sanders’ economic policies would benefit working and middle class Americans. 

Ro Khanna, a congressman from California, is the other co-chair of the Sanders presidential campaign. Khanna has actively worked to end U.S. support for Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen. 

Khanna is also one of the most effective advocates for a more peaceful and less interventionist foreign policy. If Sanders wants a VP pick who can boost his credentials on foreign policy, Khanna would be a great person to consider. 

Either Turner, 52, or Khanna, 43, could serve to help sustain the progressive movement into the next generation of political leaders. Both Bernie Sanders, 78, and Elizabeth Warren, 70, are fairly old and unlikely to remain a major force in American politics for much longer after the next presidential administration.  


2. Elizabeth Warren

Again, a unified ticket between Warren and Sanders, with either one on top, could potentially solidify the progressive wing of the Democratic party and lead it to victory against Biden in the primary. 

But if Warren or Sanders don’t want to share a ticket, Warren should consider choosing Andrew Yang to serve as her Vice President. 

Yang excites many of the same progressive voters who support Sanders. A Warren/Yang ticket could attract anti-establishment Democrats and Independents who are skeptical of Warren’s ties to the power centers of the Democratic party and her endorsement of Hilary Clinton over Bernie Sanders in 2016. 

Both Warren and Yang are policy wonks and have big, structural ideas to reform America’s economy, society, and politics. Warren is good at detailed plans, and Yang is good at crafting soundbites that resonate with voters. Their strengths could compliment each other quite well in a general election.


3. Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang lacks previous political experience. Yang should balance his ticket with someone with experience navigating Washington.

A good choice would be Ron Wyden, a Democratic U.S. Senator for Oregon, who serves on the intelligence committee. 

Wyden asked then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in March 2013 if the NSA collects data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans. Clapper replied that they did not do so, at least not wittingly, a claim that was proven false by the subsequent release of internal NSA documents leaked by Edward Snowden. 

Wyden voted against the Iraq War and supports a War Powers Resolution that would prevent the Trump Administration from further escalating hostilities with Iran.  


4. Pete Buttigieg

Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, also lacks Washington experience. He needs to balance his ticket with someone with experience in the nation’s capital, preferably a U.S. Senator. 

I have been impressed by Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic Senator from Rhode Island. Whitehouse advocates for action to address climate change and opposed President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.


5. Bill Weld 

Bill Weld served as Governor of Massachusetts from 1991 to 1997. Weld is running against President Trump in the Republican presidential primary.

One of the things that Trump’s presidency has made clear is that a president has a strong influence on the policy direction of his party. If Weld wins, he could move the Republican Party in a different direction on many issues. He describes himself as a candidate who is fiscally conservative and socially liberal. 

Weld supports gay marriage, abortion rights, and marijuana legalization. He also wants the U.S. to rejoin the Paris climate accord. Weld opposes Trump’s tariffs and the president’s withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal. 

Weld has said he is considering choosing Justin Amash as his running mate. Amash is a congressman from Michigan who came out in favor of impeachment following the release of the Mueller Report. Amash subsequently chose to leave the Republican party to become an Independent. 

Weld should also consider choosing Lamar Alexander, a Republican Senator from Tennessee, as his VP. Lamar Alexander cautiously praised the Trump Administration for its efforts to balance protecting due process for students accused of committing sexual assault on college campuses while still striving to provide safety and support for victims. 

I wrote a series of articles about the Trump Administration’s changes to the U.S. Department of Education’s interpretation of a federal civil rights law that sets guidelines for how colleges investigate allegations of sexual assault. 

Lamar Alexander worked with Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington, to negotiate a bipartisan bill to improve Obamacare in 2017. More than any other domestic political issue, healthcare policy has divided Republicans and Democrats in Washington since the fight to approve Obamacare. 

The bipartisan effort followed multiple Republican attempts to repeal or weaken Obamacare. The bipartisan bill received little traction in Washington and was not approved. 

Alexander is also known for his advocacy for funding scientific research. Scientists even named an insect after him in appreciation of his support for research funding.


6. Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard, a Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, has said she would consider nominating Republicans to positions in her administration.

A bipartisan ticket running to restore order to Washington following President Trump’s demolition of norms and decency has the potential to generate significant support. Uncompromising partisanship, especially from the GOP, has plagued American politics.

I don’t know if it’s an affliction that can be cured, but I wouldn’t fault a presidential candidate for trying to do so.

If Gabbard wants to choose a Republican VP, Weld or Alexander would be good choices.

But she could also choose former Ohio Governor John Kasich. 

Kasich appeared to be the most reasonable Republican running for president in 2016. Compared to the other final candidates in the Republican primary, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, most Democrats viewed Kasich as a breath of fresh air.

If Gabbard is more interested in shoring up her support among Democrats in the primary, then it might help for her to choose Ron Wyden or Sheldon Whitehouse.

Picking a Democratic senator might mollify Democratic voters concerned about Gabbard’s attempt to negotiate peace by meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar Al Assad or her previous opposition to LGBT rights.


7. Michael Bennet

Michael Bennet, a Democratic U.S. Senator from Colorado, hasn’t garnered much enthusiasm in his presidential run. 
 
In the unlikely event Bennet wins the nomination, he should choose former Maryland Congressman John Delaney, who is also running for the Democratic presidential nomination, as his running mate. 

Neither has attracted virtually any attention or support. 

But many people would consider voting for a ticket of boring inoffensive white guys in an election against Donald Trump. If Bennet/Delaney were to run against Trump/Pence, the entire election would be dedicated almost exclusively to a referendum on Trump. 
 
Given how many people dislike Trump’s hostile and narcissistic personality, that referendum could mean a victory for the Democratic ticket.


And that’s all of the candidates running for president. 

Or at least that’s all of the candidates that I have chosen VP choices for. Among the remaining presidential candidates, I would prefer Amy Klobuchar to Joe Biden, and Joe Biden to Donald Trump.

What VP choices would you like to see candidates consider? Let me know in the comments.