The United States is
currently engaged in covert military operations in Pakistan, Yemen, and
Somalia. These operations are largely carried out by unmanned aerial predator
drones that are controlled remotely. This program began under the Bush
Administration but has been greatly expanded under the Obama Administration.
There can be no doubt that
these attacks have killed many members of Al Qaeda. CNN’s Peter Bergen
was briefed by administration officials about the documents collected from
Osama Bin Laden’s compound after his death. They told him that Bin Laden had
written a memo in October 2010 describing his concern that the Pakistani region
of Waziristan had become too dangerous for Al Qaeda because of the CIA’s drone
program.
In August 2011, a drone killed
Al Qaeda’s number 2, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. In June 2012, a drone killed
his replacement, Abu Yahya al-Libi. These developments lead Peter Bergen to conclude
that there is only one senior member of Al Qaeda central remaining, Ayman
al-Zawahiri.
Anwar Awlaki was a senior recruiter
for Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). He helped inspire the
perpetrators of nearly a dozen
attempted terrorist
attacks,
including the Fort Hood shooting, in the US, Canada, and Britain. In September
2011, Awlaki was killed
in a drone attack. Besides being one of the most successful Al Qaeda
propagandists, something else was notable about his death. Awlaki was also a US
citizen. Some, including Glenn Greenwald and Jeremy Scahil, have criticized the
targeted killing of Awlaki because they do not think it is appropriate for a US
president to authorize the killing of a US citizen without a trial. I disagree.
Anwar Awlaki was a senior member of Al Qaeda trying to inspire others to attack
the United States. It would have been next to impossible to capture Awlaki in
Yemen. And during a war, you kill those who are trying to kill you.
In October 2011, Awlaki’s
16 year old son Abdulrahman Awlaki , who was also a US citizen, and his 17 year
old Yemini cousin were killed
in a another drone attack. Two US officials, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity to the Washington Post, said that the target
of that attack was Ibrahim al-Banna, an Egyptian senior operative of AQAP. He
was also killed
in the strike. I find the death of these
under-age casualties deeply troubling.
A recent New York Times article is the most detailed look into the classified drone program that as appeared thus far. It describes the targeted killing of Baitullah Mesud, then the head of the Pakistani Taliban. Pakistan urged the US to kill him in a drone strike. However, Mesud was more of a threat to Pakistan than to the US and thus did not meet the contemporaneous description of appropriate targets for the program. It was decided that he posed a threat to American personnel in Pakistan and that the attack would go ahead. The attack was authorized by the president even though he knew that it would almost certainly result in the death of Mesud’s wife. Both Mesud and his wife were killed. This attack violated Obama’s own correct standard that drone attacks should only be authorized if there is a “near certainty” that civilians will not be killed.
The article also explained
that Obama has not only authorized strikes against specific individuals, known
as “personality strikes,” but in Pakistan has also approved “signature
strikes,” which target individuals based upon suspicious behavior. Strikes
similar to “signature strikes,” that also do not target specific individuals
are used in Yemen and are called “Terrorist Attack Disruption Strikes.” They
are supposedly approved under tighter criteria than “signature strikes,” but
what those criteria are remain unknown to the public.
In my view, “signature
strikes” and “Terrorist Attack Disruption Strikes” leave too much room for
error and mistaken identity. I believe that only “personality strikes” against specific
individuals should be authorized.
Drone strikes have become the main recruiting point for Al Qaeda and have spread anti-American sentiment in the areas where they have been deployed.
An investigation
by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), which is based in the UK,
found multiple instances of deliberate follow-up drone attacks that have killed
rescuers as well as an example of a deliberate attack on a funeral in an
earlier, unsuccessful attempt to kill Baitullah Mesud.
Determining the statistics
of drone strikes is a difficult task. The BIJ, nevertheless, has attempted the
task. They report that in 2011 there were 76 drone strikes in Pakistan,
13 confirmed and 12 possible strikes in Yemen,
and 9 strikes in Somalia.
The Bureau also reports
that in 2011 a minimum of 75 civilians died in Pakistan
as a result of drone strikes, including 6 children. In 2011, there were 39 reported
civilian casualties in Yemen
and 15 in Somalia.
The aforementioned New York Times
article revealed that Obama accepted the CIA’s method for classifying the
casualties of the drone program. All military age males killed in a strike are
counted as combatants, unless explicit evidence later confirms their innocence.
This has lead to perpetually deceptive government claims of the numbers of
civilians and militants killed as a result of the program.
The drone program is a
valuable one which has killed many senior level members of Al Qaeda, but I
believe that it has gone too far. Only “personality strikes” against individuals
should be carried out. I also think that we use drone strikes too frequently.
Only the senior leaders of Al Qaeda and affiliated groups should be targeted,
as mid-level managers are easy to replace.
I believe that we should only carry out about 12 drone strikes as year, and
those should only be authorized if there is a “near certainty” that there will
be no civilian deaths. This of course precludes attacking rescuers and
funerals. Drone strikes are a valuable
tool in the war against Al Qaeda, but their misuse, and overuse, results in
civilian casualties and leads to resentment against the United States which can
be used by Al Qaeda to recruit the next generation of terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment