Gender Census, 2025

 

The most popular nonbinary identities remain remarkably consistent, according to the 2025 Gender Census.

The Gender Census is an annual global online survey of nonbinary people, whose gender isn’t strictly male or female.

The 11 terms that received more than 20% in the Gender Census, in 2025, are the same ones that received more than 20% in the previous two years.

 

 

Primary Source: 2025 Gender Census

 

The Gender Census asks respondents, “Which of the following best describes in English how you think of yourself?”

Respondents may select as many checkboxes as they want. 

 

A total of 43,096 respondents took part in the survey, which was conducted from July 30 to August 30, 2025. 

A majority of respondents, 53%, were from the United States. 

After that, the countries with the most respondents were the United Kingdom (11%), Canada (7%), Germany (6%), and Australia (5%).  

 

 

 

We’ll begin our analysis by examining the terms chosen by more than 20% of respondents in 2025, before exploring words chosen by fewer than 20%.

This article will focus on the statistical results of the survey, rather than attempt to define each of the identity terms.

Definitions for identity terms can be found in previous articles, and future articles, in this series.

 

This article is part of my ongoing coverage of LGBT identities.

Gender Identity and Biological Sex discussed the most common transgender and nonbinary identities.

How Nonbinary people describe themselves and Nonbinary Nomenclature discussed the most common terms from the 2023 Gender Census.

Gender Census, 2024 examined the results of last year’s survey.

 

This article is part of Season 3 of LGBT by the Numbers, a series that explores LGBT identity in the United States, and around the world.

Thusfar, Season 3 has examined how the most common terms from the Gender Census have performed in annual surveys over the past decade.

 

 

 

Above 20%

 

Eleven identity terms received more than 20% in the 2025 Gender Census.

 

Nonbinary               61.7%

Queer                     56.1%

Trans                      46.5%

Transgender           41.1%

 

A person / human / [my name] / “I’m just me.”      39.7%

 

Gender Non-Conforming     36.0%

Genderqueer                       34.6%

Enby                                    30.1%

Transmasculine                   27.7%

Genderfluid                         24.4%

Agender                              24.3%

 

 

This graph shows the top identity terms from the 2025 Gender Census.

 

I created the graphs in the this article with flourish, a website that allows users to create compelling visual aids. 

 

The top 11 terms in the 2025 Gender Census are in the same order as last year, with one exception.

Transgender surpassed “A person / human / [my name] / ‘I’m just me’ ” for fourth place.  

 

From 2015 to 2025, Trans has outperformed Transgender by an average of 5.3%.

Normally, there is at least one identity term located in the gap between Trans and Transgender.

The only years where Trans and Transgender have been located next to each other, without at least one identity term in between, were 2015 and 2025.

 

Ten of the top 11 identity words increased in 2025, compared to the year before.

The largest increases were for queer (+2.5%), transgender (+2.3%), and genderqueer (+2.0%).

 

The only identity term in the top 11 that deceased in 2025 was genderfluid, which only fell by 0.3% from the year before.

 

 

 

The following line graphs show how the results of the 2025 Gender Census compare to those from previous years.

 

This graph shows how the top eight identity terms from the 2025 Gender Census performed each year since 2015.

 

 

 

This graph shows how the sixth through eleventh most popular terms from the 2025 Gender Census have performed since 2015.

 

 

 

Genderfluid and Agender have generally performed similarly in the Gender Census.

This year was no exception.

In 2025, the percent of respondents who identified as Genderfluid was only 0.1% higher than the percent who identified as Agender.

 

 

 

 

 

Queer received 56.1% in 2025, which is the most it has received since it was added as a checkbox in 2019.

 

 

 

 

Transgender received 41.1% in 2025, which is the most it has ever received in the Gender Census.

 

 

 

Now, let’s view these results together on an admittedly chaotic graph.

This graph shows the performance of identity words in the Gender Census, from 2015 to 2025, that received between 20% and 50%.

The line for nonbinary, and part of the line for queer, appear above the cutoff for the graph.

If you can stand the complexity and chaos of the graph, it’s able to convey a lot of interesting information, in a small amount of space.

 

 

 

Below 20%

 

Nine terms received less than 20% in the 2025 Gender Census.

 

Fag                        19.6%

Dyke                      14.2%

Questioning           12.1%

Transfeminine       11.7%

Tranny                   11.3%

 

Autigender            5.5%

None                     4.5%

Cisgender             3.6%

Binary                   1.6%

 

 

The term autigender refers to when someone’s gender, or their experience of gender, is influenced by their autism.

Autigender was chosen by 5.5% of respondents in the 2025 Gender Census.

You can learn more about autistic people’s experiences with gender in a great article from Men’s Health.

 

 

 

This graph shows the bottom identity words from the 2025 Gender Census.

 

 

Terms are added and removed from the bottom of the checkbox list each year.

Therefore, it’s not possible to compare results from year-to-year for all checkboxes.

 

Nevertheless, let’s examine the bottom identity terms that were available in both 2024 and 2025.

In 2025, fag (+2.5%) saw the largest increase, and questioning (-1.8%) saw the largest decrease, compared to the year before.

 

Dyke wasn’t listed in the 2024 survey, but it did appear in 2023.

From 2023 to 2025, dyke increased by 2.3%.

 

 

 

You can compare the performance of the bottom identity words from the 2025 Gender Census to previous years in the graph below.

This graph shows the how the bottom identity words from the 2024 and 2025 Gender Census have performed each year since 2015.

 

 

 

This line graph previews many of the terms we will examine more closely in subsequent articles.

As we continue Season 3 of LGBT by the Numbers, we will explore the identity terms that received less than 20% in the Gender Census.

So join me next time as we continue to explore LGBT identity, by the numbers.

 

 

My 2024 Political Donations

  

As we continue to explore the results of last year’s election, it’s finally time to examine my personal political donations, with the assistance of several colorful tables and graphs.

In 2024, I donated $455 to political candidates campaigning for Congress and the Kansas Legislature.

 

I previously discussed my political donations for elections in 2020, 2022, and 2023.

 

This article is part of an ongoing series that explores the results of last year’s election.

I have covered the results of elections for the US Senate, US House, and the Kansas Legislature.

I also graded the accuracy of predictions for the US Senate elections.

 

Last year, I encouraged readers to donate to Democrats running for the Kansas Legislature.

My most recent article examined the performance of the candidates who received those donations.

This article, by contrast, explores the performance of candidates I personally donated to last year.

 

 

 

Overview

 

I financially supported 16 candidates in 2024.

Only two of those candidates, Dan Osman and Derek Tran, won their elections.

The other 14 candidates lost.

 

This table lists my donations from largest to smallest, with the candidates I gave the most to, listed first.

I will discuss each of these elections later in this article.

For the most part, discussions of these elections, in this article, will generally follow the order of the candidates as they appear in this table.

 

The table is color-coded.

In the “Office Sought” column, congressional candidates are highlighted in purple. Candidates for the Kansas Senate are highlighted in green.

In the “2024 Margin” column, races won by Democrats are highlighted in blue, and races won by Republicans are highlighted in pink.

Mathew Reinhold lost a Democratic primary, so his “2024 Margin” displays the margin of his loss in the primary.

I created the tables and graphs in this article in Excel.  

 

 

 

This table displays my donations based on the margin of victory, with the closest races listed first.

The color-coding conventions are the same as they were in the first table.

 

 

 

By and large, my donations were wisely spent on candidates whose races were decided by narrow margins.

 

22% of my donations went to races where the margin was decided by less than 3%. 

44% of my donations went to races where the margin was decided by less than 5%.

74% of my donations went to races where the margin was decided by less than 7%.

 

 

 

 

Kansas Senate

 

I donated $90 to candidates running for the Kansas Senate.

That accounts for 20% of my 2024 donations.

 

I donated to two Democrats running for the Kansas Senate, Andrew Mall and Dena Sattler, both of whom lost their elections.

 

 

I donated $50 to Andrew Mall.

 

I donated more to Andrew Mall in 2024 than any other candidate.

Andrew Mall (D) lost a Kansas Senate race in Dist. 10, in Johnson County, to incumbent Mike Thompson (R) by 4.8%, or 2,176 votes.

Thompson received 52%, and Mall received 48%.

 

Elections for the Kansas Senate are held every four years.

2024 was the first election for the Kansas Senate after redistricting, so exercise caution when comparing the 2024 and 2020 results. 

 

In 2020, Mike Thompson (R) defeated Lindsey Constance (D), in Dist. 10, by 3.7%, or 1,604 votes.

Thompson received 51.9%, and Constance received 48.1%.

 

 

 

I donated $40 to Dena Sattler.

 

Dena Sattler (D) lost a Kansas Senate race in Dist. 3 to incumbent Rick Kloos (R) by 14.8%, or 5,657 votes.

Dist. 3 is located in Osage, Douglas, Franklin, and Shawnee counties.

Kloos received 57%, and Sattler received 43%.

 

Sattler’s race didn’t end up being competitive. But prior to the election, the results from the most recent Kansas Senate elections indicated it might be.

 

In 2020, Rick Kloos (R) defeated incumbent Anthony Hensley (D), in Dist. 19, by 2.1%, or 658 votes.

That election was the closest Kansas Senate Race in 2020.

Kloos was redistricted into Dist. 3 for the 2024 election.

 

 

This table, which first appeared in, “Republicans gain seats in the Kansas Legislature,” shows the results of the closest Kansas Senate elections in 2024.

 

 

 

US Senate 

I donated $45 to Dan Osborn.

Dan Osborn ran as an independent in a two-way US Senate race in Nebraska against incumbent Republican Deb Fischer.

Nebraska Democrats chose not to nominate a candidate for the race.

Osborn lost the Nebraska US Senate race to Fischer (R) by 6.7%, or 62,631 votes.

Fischer received 53.3%, and Osborn received 46.7%.

 

US Senators serve 6-year terms, so Senate seats are up for election every six years.

Even though Osborn lost, he managed to narrow Fischer’s margin of victory considerably, compared to her election in 2018.

In 2018, Deb Fischer was reelected to the US Senate by 19%.

Fischer (R) received 58%, Jane Raybould (D) received 39%, and Jim Schultz (L) received 4%.

 

Nebraska was the only US Senate race, decided by less than 10%, where the margin swung away from Republicans in 2024, compared to 2018.

The following table first appeared in, “Republicans win Senate Control.”

 

 

 

 

Dan Osborn is running in Nebraska for the US Senate, again, in 2026.

 

 

 

Dan Osborn was the only US Senate Candidate I supported financially last year.

Donations to US Senate races account for 10% of my 2024 political donations.

 

 

Osborn was the only independent candidate I supported financially last year.

The other 15 candidates I supported financially are Democrats.

Democrats received 90% of my political donations last year, and one independent candidate, Osborn, received the remaining 10%.

 

 

Last year, I donated $45 to support Osborn, an independent, and $410 to support Democratic candidates.

 

 

 

 

Kansas House

 

I financially supported 10 Democrats running for the Kansas House.

Only one of those candidates, Dan Osman, won their election.

 

I donated $290 to candidates running for the Kansas House.

That accounts for 64%, or almost two-thirds, of my 2024 political donations.

 

Last year, I donated to seven of the eleven Kansas House races where the margin was decided by less than 6%.

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Dan Osman.

 

Incumbent Dan Osman (D) won a Kansas House Race, in Dist. 48, in Johnson County, against Randy Ross (R) by 5.8%, or 723 votes. 

Osman received 53%, and Ross received 47%.

 

The election in Dist. 48 was the only Kansas House race decided by less than 8% where the margin shifted toward Democrats, compared to 2022.

All of the other 12 Kansas House races decided by less than 8% had their margin shift in favor of Republicans, compared to 2022.

You can see this in the table below, which first appeared in “Republicans gain seats in the Kansas Legislature.”

 

 

I donated $30 to Ace Allen.

Ace Allen (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 28, in Johnson County, to incumbent Carl Turner (R) by 1.2%, or 155 votes.

Turner received 50.6%, and Allen received 49.4%. 

 

Elections are held for the Kansas House every two years.

The Kansas House race in Dist. 28 was a rematch between the same candidates who ran against each other two years earlier.

 

In 2022, incumbent Carl Turner (R) defeated Ace Allen (D) by 0.6%, or 60 votes.

Turner received 50.3%, and Allen received 49.7%.

The Kansas House race in Dist. 28, in Johnson County, was the closest Kansas House race, in the entire state, in both 2022 and 2024.

 

 

 

I donated 30 to Veronica Gillette.

Veronica Gillette (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 88, in Sedgwick and Butler counties, to incumbent Sandy Pickert (R) by 2.1%, or 187 votes.

Pickert received 51.1%, and Gillette received 48.9%.

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Dennis Miller.

Incumbent Dennis Miller (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 14, in Johnson County, to Charlotte Esau (R) by 2.7% or 404 votes.

Esau received 51.4%, and Miller received 48.6%.

 

The 2024 election in Kansas House Dist. 14, in Johnson County, was a rematch between the same candidates who ran against each other two years earlier.

In 2022, Dennis Miller (D) defeated incumbent Charlotte Esau (R) by 221 votes, or 2.0%.

Miller (D) received 51.0%, and Esau (R) received 49.0%.

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Vanessa Vaughn West.

Vanessa Vaughn West (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 39, in Johnson County, to Angela Stiens (R) by 3.2%, or 419 votes.

Stiens received 51.6%, and West received 48.4%.

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Aimee Bateman.

Aimee Bateman (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 41, in Leavenworth County, to incumbent Pat Proctor (R) by 5.1%, or 324 votes.

Proctor received 52.6%, and Bateman received 47.4%.

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Betsey Lasister.

Betsey Lasister (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 30, in Johnson County, to incumbent Laura Williams (R) by 5.2%, or 607 votes.

Williams received 52.6%, and Lasister received 47.4%.

 

 

 

 

I financially supported two Democrats running in the Kansas House race in Dist. 33, in Wyandotte County.

 

Mathew Reinhold was the first Democrat to file to run in the election.

After he filed, I followed Reinhold on Twitter, where I enjoyed reading his political commentary.

I donated $20 to Mathew Reinhold, before another Democratic candidate, Eli Woody, entered the race.

Woody filed to run in the election right before the filing deadline in early June.

 

In the Aug. 6 primary, Woody received 58%, and Reinhold received 42%.

Woody won the Democratic primary by 16%, or 160 votes.

 

 

After the primary, I donated $30 to Eli Woody.

 

Woody lost the general election to incumbent Republican Mike Thompson, in Dist. 33, in Wyandotte County, by 13%, or 1,235 votes.  

Thompson (R) received 57%, and Woody (D) received 43%.

 

 

The 2024 election for Kansas House Dist. 33, in Wyandotte County, wasn’t competitive, but it had been two years earlier.

In 2022, Mike Thompson (R) won Dist. 33, in Wyandotte County, by 367 votes, or 5.6%.

Thompson (R) received 51%, Bill Hutton (D) received 46%, and Stephanie Barton (L) received 3%.

 

 

 

 

 

I donated $30 to Bill Hammond.

Bill Hammond (D) lost a Kansas House race, in Dist. 117, in Johnson and Douglas counties, to incumbent Adam Turk (R) by 15%, or 2,232 votes.

Turk received 57.5%, and Hammond received 42.5%.

 

The Kansas House race in Dist. 117, in Johnson and Douglas counties, wasn’t competitive in 2024, but it had been two years earlier.

In 2022, Adam Turk (R) won the Kansas House race in Dist. 117 by 3.9%, or 435 votes.

Turk (R) received 52%, and Courtney Tripp (D) received 48%.

 

 

 

 

US House

 

I financially supported three Democrats running for the US House.

Only one of those candidates, Derek Tran, won their election.

Nevertheless, all three races were decided by less than 4%.

 

I donated $30 to US House races.

That accounts for 7% of my 2024 political donations.

 

 

I donated $10 to Derek Tran.

 

Derek Tran (D) won a US House race, in California-45, in Orange and Los Angeles counties, against incumbent Michelle Steel (R) by 0.21%, or 653 votes.

Tran received 50.1%, and Steel received 49.9%.

 

Tran's race was one of the closest US House races, nationwide, in 2024, as you can see in the table below, which first appeared in "Republicans retain House control." 

 

 

 

 

I donated $10 to Amish Shah.

Amish Shah (D) lost a US House race, in Arizona-1, in Maricopa County, against incumbent David Schweikert (R) by 3.81%, or 16,572 votes.

Schweikert received 51.9%, and Shah received 48.1%.

 

 

I donated $10 to Lanon Baccam.

Lanon Baccam (D) lost a US House race, in Iowa-3, against incumbent Zach Nunn (R) by 3.83%, or 15,784 votes.

Nunn received 51.9%, and Baccam received 48.1%.

Iowa-3 is roughly located in southwest Iowa.

 

 

 

 

 

Donations by Office Sought

 

I donated $290 to Kansas House races, $90 to Kansas Senate races, $45 to a US Senate race, and $30 to US House races.

 

Almost two-thirds of my donations went to Kansas House races.

64% of my donations went to Kansas House races, 20% went to Kansas Senate races, 10% went to a US Senate race, and 7% went to US House races.

 

 

 

 

Donations by Location

 

I donated $380 to elections in Kansas, all of which went to candidates running for the Kansas Legislature.

I donated $45 to a US Senate race in Nebraska.

I donated $10 to US House races in each of the following states: California, Arizona, and Iowa.

 

84% of my donations went to elections in Kansas, and 16% of my donations went to elections in other states.

10% of my donations went to an election in Nebraska.

2% of my donations went to an election in California.

2% of my donations went to an election in Arizona.

2% of my donations went to an election in Iowa.

 

 

 

 

We can break down my Kansas donations even further.

Many competitive Kansas Legislative races are located in Johnson County.

Last year, 63.6% of Kansas House races decided by less than 6% were located in Johnson County, and 66.7% of Kansas Senate races decided by less than 6% were located entirely or partially in Johnson County.

 

 

Let’s break down my 2024 Kansas donations by county.

For legislative districts that are located in multiple counties, I split my donations to the district evenly between those counties.

 

 

I donated $215 to races in Johnson County, $50 to races in Wyandotte County, $30 to a race in Leavenworth County, and $25 to races in Douglas County.

I donated $15 each to races in Sedgwick and Butler counties.  

I donated $10 each to races in Shawnee, Franklin, and Osage counties.

 

57% of my Kansas donations went to races in Johnson County, 13% went to races in Wyandotte County, and all other counties each received less than 10%.

 

 

 

 

Now, let’s take this county-level data and return to my donations as a whole.

I donated $215 to races in Johnson County, $165 to races elsewhere in Kansas, and $75 to races outside of Kansas.

 

 

47% of my total donations went to races in Johnson County, 36% went to races elsewhere in Kansas, and 16% went to races outside of Kansas.

 

 

 

 

Now let’s take a look at a very silly graph.

This graph shows my total political donations. The Kansas donations are split by county, and the donations outside Kansas are split by state.

 

 

I donated $215 to races in Johnson County, $50 to races in Wyandotte County, $45 to a race in Nebraska, $30 to a race in Leavenworth County, and $25 to races in Douglas County.

I donated $15 each to Sedgwick and Butler counties.

I donated $10 each to Shawnee County, Franklin County, Osage County, California, Arizona, and Iowa.

 

 

47% of my total donations went to Johnson County, 11% went to Wyandotte County, 10% went to Nebraska, 7% went to Leavenworth County, and 5% went to Douglas County.

Sedgwick and Butler counties each received 3%.

Shawnee County, Franklin County, Osage County, California, Arizona, and Iowa each received 2%.

 

 

 

 

Donations by Win-Loss

 

Now, let’s examine the percent of donations that went to candidates who won, and the percent that went to candidates who lost.

 

Only two of the candidates I supported financially won their elections.

I donated $30 to Dan Osman, who won the Kansas House Race, in Dist. 48, in Johnson County.

I donated $10 to Derek Tran, who won the US House race, in California-45, in Orange and Los Angeles counties.

 

I donated $40 to candidates who won their elections.

I donated $415 to candidates who lost their elections.

 

 

Only 9% of my donations went to candidates who won their elections.

91% of my donations went to candidates who lost.

 

 

Next, let’s examine the percent of candidates that I supported financially who won their races.

Two of the candidates who I supported financially won their elections, and 14 lost their elections.

12.5% of the candidates I supported financially won their elections, and 87.5% of the candidates I supported financially lost their elections.

 

 

 

Donations by Month

 

This graph shows when I donated to political candidates throughout the year.

 

 

The exact figures for each month are shown in the table below.

 

On the graph above, you can clearly see when I lost my job.

I lost my job working for a car wash on June 6, and I began working for Door Dash on August 20.

I originally planned for my donations to be fairly evenly distributed over time, but I didn’t make any political contributions in June or July, because I was unemployed, and I didn’t have an income.

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

Overall, the 2024 elections were catastrophic for Democrats.

 

Donald Trump was reelected president, Republicans won control of both chambers of Congress, and Republicans increased their supermajorities in both chambers of the Kansas Legislature.

Nevertheless, I spent my political donations wisely on candidates whose races were determined by narrow margins.

With practice donating across several elections, I have gotten better at making sure my contributions go to competitive races where they will be spent well.